Shifts in Soybean Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Nutrient Stoichiometry: A Historical Synthesis-Analysis

The paper "Shifts in Soybean Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Nutrient Stoichiometry: A Historical Synthesis-Analysis" by Guillermo R. Balboa, Victor O. Sadras, and Ignacio A. Ciampitti has been published at Crop Sci. 58:1–12 (2018).

	Abstract Few studies have investigated changes over time in nutrient uptake and yield, in addition to the study of nutrient stoichiometry as a met­ric of nutrient limitations in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. A comprehensive synthesis-analysis was performed by compiling a global historical soybean database of yield, total bio­mass, and nutrient (N, P, and K) content and concentration in studies published from 1922 to 2015. This period was divided in three eras based on genetically modified soybean events: Era I (1922–1996), Era II (1997–2006), and Era III (2007–2015). The main findings of this review are: (i) seed yield improved from 1.3 Mg ha−1 in the 1930s to 3.2 Mg ha−1 in the 2010s; (ii) yield increase was primarily driven by increase in bio­mass rather than harvest index (HI); (iii) both N and P HIs increased over time; (iv) seed nutri­ent concentration remained stable for N and declined for both P (18%) and K (13%); (v) stover nutrient concentration remained stable for N, diminished for P, and increased for K; (vi) nutri­ent ratios portray different trends for N/P (Era I and III > II), N/K (Era I > II and III), and K/P (Era II and III > I); (vii) yield per unit of nutrient uptake (internal efficiency) increased for N (33%) and P (44%) and decreased for K (11%); and (viii) varia­tions in nutrient internal efficiency were primarily explained by increase in nutrient HI for N and K, but equally explained by both HI for P and seed P concentration. These findings have implications for soybean production and integrated nutrient management to improve yield, nutrient use efficiency, and seed nutrient composition.
Soybean study at Rossville, KS (2017) with historical varieties and maturity groups. On the left modern soybean (2014, maturity group: 3.1) on the right old cultivar (1980, maturity group: 3.0). Row spacing 0.76 m. Clearly differences in canopy architecture and leaves shape and position.	Soybean study at Rossville, KS (2017) with historical varieties and maturity groups. Soybean is ready to be harvested. Row spacing 0.76 m.
Photo credits to Mr. Osler Ortez (MS Student at KSU Crop Production Team, Kansas State University).