01 Jun 2015

Breaking yield barriers in soybean: Preliminary results of the first year of experimentation at Oliveros - Argentina

Poster presentation at the 2015 Fertility Symposium


The field study has been established on November 2014 at the Experimental Station of INTA at Oliveros (Santa Fe, Argentina) (Table 1). The factors under study are: soybean maturity group, row spacing, planting date, and nutrient management (inoculation, P rate and time, S rate, B and Zn rates, N rate, placement, and time).

Table 1. Treatments at the EEA INTA Oliveros site. Argentina, 2014/15 season.
Treatment
Famer
Practices (FP)
Comprehensive Fertilization (CF)Production Intensity (PI)Ecological Intensification (CF+ PI)
Seed TreatmentFungicide + Insecticide
Herbicide managementPRE + POST
Agronomic management
Soybean maturityDM 4970DM 4970LDC 4.7LDC 4.7
Row Spacing52522626
Fungicide ApplicationYes
Planting date28 Nov28 Nov7 Nov7 Nov
Target seeding rate (seeds/ha)290,000290.000440,000440,000
Nutrient managementStandardAdvancedStandardAdvanced
InoculationNoneSingle rate +
PGR
NoneSingle rate +
PGR
P (STP)
in 2 x2 at seeding
NO20 kg P ha-1NO20 kg P ha-1
P strategyWithout
P
Broadcasted on July 2014Without
P
Broadcasted on July 2014
SulfurNO20 kg S ha-1 (Gypsum)NO20 kg S ha-1
(Gypsum)
Micros
(B + Zn + Mn)
0B, foliar at R2-30B, foliar at R2-3
Reproductive N
(R4-5)
050050
                                            • Biological N fixation will be determined using the 15N abundance method.
                                            • “Rescue” irrigation was not needed.


Plots were harvested on mid-April, preliminary data is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Grain yield, seed weight and seeds per m2 for the four treatments evaluated at Oliveros (Santa Fe, Argentina). 2014/15 season.
Farmer

Practices (FP)

Comprehensive Fertilization (CF)
Production Intensity (PI)
Ecological Intensification (CF+ PI)
Grain yield (kg/ha)
5199
5491
5291
5495
Grain weight (g/1000 grains)
180.4
190.8
161.8
165.3
Grains per m2
2880.6
2878.5
3269.9
3322.8
  • On average, the four agronomic management and fertilization strategies yielded higher than 5200 kg ha-1, there were no significant differences among treatments or interaction effects of management practices and fertilization strategies.
  • Intensive management (average of PI and CF+PI) increased the number of grains per m-2 respect to standard management (average of FP and CF) (P <0.01) by 14.5%. Nutritional management had no significant effect (P> 0.60) in this component.
  • Grain weight increased by 4% in response to intensive fertilization (average of CF and CF+PI) compared to standard nutrient management (average of FP and PI) (P <0.04). However, standard practices (average of FP and CF) increased individual grain weight by 13.5% compared to intensive management (average of PI and CF+PI) (P <0.001).
  • In summary, increases of 14% in the number of grains per effect of intensive management practices were offset by an increase of 13.5% in grain weight in the standard management. Comprehensive fertilization tended to increase grain yields but these increases were not statistically significant (+204 to 292 kg/ha).
A more detailed report will be available in the next months.

Additional Resources

Poster Soybean Systems 2015 - FINAL.pdfSize: 0.34 MB